学习この友🧑‍🤝‍🧑🧑‍🤝‍🧑

2022年5月12日星期四

Business law Chapter 4 : Agency

 Chapter 4: Agency

1.Agency is the relationship which subsist between a principal and an agent, where the agent has been authorized to act for the principal or represent him in dealing with a third party.

2.如果我们选minor or unsound mind的人做agent,saman会saman principal。如果选agent成年和没有sot,出问题是agent承担。

3.如果agent breach of agreement,principal可以对agent提出诉讼

4. express appointment 口语或白字黑字指定agent

5. implied express 不一定要用言语表达,可以用行动or肢体表达指定agent

6. Principal要知道 agent和第三方签的合同

7. Agency不需要特地dafter,没有固定form的方法

8.Agency 不需要consideration

9.ratification

    -如果principal 没选agent,agent自己帮忙,就要看principal愿不愿意给comission

    -如果agent 乱乱来,principal要卖5000,agent卖4000,principal可以选择要不要承认contract 如果principal不愿意承认,agent 要自己承担损失。

10broker-没有拿货

11.factor有拿货

12.commision agent-卖货拿commision

卖了就算了 第三方有没有还钱不关他们的事

13. a del credere agent 不止卖货,还要确保第三方有还钱

14. power of attorney 有case在mahkamah,ada peguam帮我们urus dari segi undang-undang,可以变成公司的agent

Types of agency


Rights and duties of agent toward principal

1.Agent‘s duties in conducting principal’s business (Case Turpin V Bilton)

💙Section 164 of the Contract Act- An agent is bound to conduct the business of his principal according to the directions given by the principal. When the agent act otherwise, if any loss be accrues, he must account for it, and, if any profit sustained, he must make it good to his principal 
💟Fact:Bilton是agent,他得到Turpin的委托去拿车的insurance。Agent没有去拿insurance,所以principal(Turpin)要承担损失。 
💟Held:Bilton身为agent已经breach of contract了,他没有服从principal的指示。因此,Bilton需要赔偿Turpin的损失。
#如果principal没有任何指示,agent要按照惯例行事(也是需要帮忙get insurance)

2.Agent‘s duty to possess skill and diligence (Case Keppel V Wheeler)

💙Section 165 of the Contract Act - an agent is bond to conduct the business if the agency with as much skill as in generally possessed by persons engaged in similar business, unless the principal has notice for his want of skills 
💟Fact: Wheeler 是agent,Wheeler帮 Keppel(principal)卖屋子,。有个人来买屋子,Wheeler接受这个offer。几天后,有另外一个人来看房子,并打算用更高的价格来买屋子。Wheeler身为agent 没有告知Keppel 第二个offer。然后Keppel 和第一个offeror正式签约。Keppel得知后,对Wheeler提出诉讼。 
💟Held:Wheeler要赔偿Keppel两个offer之间的损失

 

3.Agent‘s duty to render proper accounts

💙Section 166 of the Contract Act- An agent is bound to render proper accounts to his principal on demand

 

4.Agent‘s duty to communicate with principal (Case Springer V Great Western Railway)

💙Section 167 of the Contract Act - It is the duty of an agent, in cases of difficultly, to use all reasonable diligence in communicating with his principal, and in seeking to obtain his instruction 
💟Fact: Great Western Railway 是agent帮Springer(principal)卖tomato从Jersey to Covent Garden Market。因为天气关系,船迟到达Weymouth 然后一些tomato看起来要坏了,Great Western Raiway没有问 Springer,就直接将tomato卖给当地人。因为Great Western Railway认为tomato不会以良好的状况到达目的地。 
💟Held:Great Western Railway要赔偿Springer的损失

 

5.Agent‘s duty to act in good faith (Case Armstrong V Jackson)

💙Section 168 of the Contract Act - If an agent deals on his own account in the business of the agency, without first obtaining the consent of the principal and acquainting him with all material circumstance which have come to his own knowledge on the subject, the principal may repudiate the transaction, if the case shows either that any material fact has been dishonestly concealed from him. 
💟Fact: Jackson是agent,Armstrong是principal。Armstrong要和Jackson买股份,Jackson在没有告知Armstrong的情况下,把自己的股份卖给了Armstrong。Jackson身为agent,应该重视principal的利益而不是优先自己的利益。他应该告知principal这是自己的股份。 
💟Held:Jackson not act in good faith。他不能与principal有这样的交易,应该明确告诉principal

 

6.Agent‘s duty to not take any secret profit (Case Andrew V Ramsey&Co)

💙Section 169 of the Contract Act - If an agent,without the knowledge of his principal, deals in the business of the agency of his own account instead of on account of his principal, the principle is entitled to claim for from the agent any benefit which may have resulted to him from the transaction 
💟Fact: Ramsey &Co 是agent,Andrew是principal。Ramsey&Co 帮Andrew卖property,Ramsey&Co 收Andrew给的commission同时跟buyer收secret profit。 Andrew知道后对Ramsey&Co 提出诉讼要拿回repayment。
💟Held:Andrew上诉成功。Agent无权拿secret profit

Rights and duties of principal toward agents

1.to pay commission

💙Section 172 of the Contract Act - Payment for the performance of any act is not due to the agent until the completion of the act
💙Section 173 of the Contract Act - An agent who is guilty of misconduct in the business of the agency is not entitled to any remuneration

2.cannot prevent agent from earning his commission

3.to indemnify and reimburse the agents


Termination of agency

1.by the act of parties

💙出notice解约

2.by operation of law

💙Section 154 of Contract Act 1950-
    
    💟business of agency is completed完成交易
    💟by the expiration period agreed by both parties 预期了,双方同意解散
    💟by death of agent or principal 其中一方去世
    💟by subsequent insanity of the agent or principal 其中一方有mental problem
    💟by bankruptcy of the principal 委托人破产
    💟by frustration or by happening of an event which renders the agency unlawful 发生使该机构非法的事件














2022年5月8日星期日

Case chapter 2.2 Case of business law

 💜Offer是Section 2(a)-When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtain the assent of that other to the act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal

1.Case Boulton V Jones

Fact:Jones 和第三方买货。他已经给对方offer了,可是第三方把货卖给了Boulton。Boulton知道后把货转卖给Jones。当Jones知道这个货是从Boulton买的而不是第三方,Jones拒绝支付给Boulton。Boulton因此上诉Jones

Held:Jones不需要支付给Boulton。这是因为Jones和Boulton没有offer and acceptance,他是和第三方有offer (specific offer

How an offer could be made?

💜Section 9- So far as the proposal or acceptance of any promise is made in words, the promise is said to be express. So far as the proposal or acceptance is made otherwise than in words, the promise is said to be implied

2.Case Guthing V Lynn

Fact: Lynn 跟 Guthing买了一匹马,如果这匹马可以带来好运, Lynn将支付Guthing额外的$5,可是Lynn并没有支付$5给 Guthing
Held:带来好运 这个词太含糊不清,因此此合约是void的

💜Section 3 -the communication of proposals, the acceptance of proposals, and the revocation of proposals and acceptance, respectively, are deemed to be made by any act or omission of the party proposing, accepting or revoking, by which he intends to communicate the proposal, acceptance or revocation, or which has the effect of communicating it

💜Section4(1)-the communication of a proposal is complete when it comes to the knowledge of the person to whom it is made 

3.Case Taylor V Laird

Fact: Caption Laird在一次的航海期间退休了,另外一个正规的caption(Taylor)为他提供剩余的服务。(Taylor没有寻求Laird的同意)。事后,Taylor向Laird claim赔偿损失。

Held:Laird不需要偿还Taylor,因为彼此之间没有acceptance,offer是no valid的。Laird没有机会拒绝或同意

ITT

1.Advertisement (Case Coelho V The Public Service Commission)

Fact: Coelho从报纸看到了招聘广告,去面试,Public Service Commission同意了面试结果。之后,Public Service Commission尝试毁约,认为这是ITT 不是offer

Held:这是一个valid的contract。因为Public Service Commission和Coelho有了offer,因此不能随便毁约

2. Advertisement (Case Harrison V Nickerson)

Fact:Nickerson 登广告表示拍卖会有A产品。Harrison是为了A产品才到拍卖会的。但是到了拍卖会的时候,Harrison发现没有A产品。Harrison要和Nickerson claim赔偿

Held:在这种情况,没有promise,没有条件,广告只是ITT不是offer,所以只是ITT

3. Self-service outlet (Case Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain V Boots Cash Chemist)

Fact:Boost Cash Chemist介绍self-service system是顾客从shelf拿货品,然后在counter结账。任何有关毒品的货物,pharmacist就要避免卖(要阻止transaction). Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain 提起诉讼,以确定该制度在药品销售方面的合法性

Held:Good on the shelf 是ITT 不是 offer,所以是可行的

4.Auction (Case Payne V Cave)

Fact:Cave先生在拍卖会以最高价格把Payne的商品标下。可是呢,在那个拍卖者
敲hammer前改变主意了。Payne随后提起诉讼

Held:Cave 可以取消这场拍卖,因为还没有敲hammer,offer还没有made。

5.Exhibition of the shop window (Case Fisher V Bell)

Fact:Bell把flick knife展示在商店的窗口,并且贴上价格。根据法律,售卖flick knife是刑事犯罪。

Held:product展示在shop的是ITT 不是offer,所以不属于刑事犯罪

💜Section 5(1) - A proposal may be revoked at any time before the communication of its acceptance is complete as against the proposer but not afterwards

6. Revocation by communication (Case Byrne V Vien Tian Hoven)

Fact: Vien Tian Hoven 卖货给Byrne,(在10月1日寄信),在10月8日before acceptance)Byrne寄出一封revoke offer的信,但是Vien Tian Hoven 在10月11日寄出acceptance letter。Vien Tian Hoven在 10月20日才收到revoke的信

Held:Revocation must be communicated

7. Revocation by counter offer (Case Hyde V Wrench)

Fact: Wrench 在6月6日卖 Hyde land for $ 1000。在6月8日,Hyde 做了一个counter offer用$950买下那个land。 Wrench拒绝以$950卖给 Hyde。Hyde再次以$1000的价格和Wrench买land。Wrench拒绝。Hyde提起诉讼。

Held:Wrench有权不卖给Hyde。当counter offer made,original contract就不valid了。新的counter offer还没有被accept。

Acceptance


💜Section 2(b)of the Contract Act 1950- When the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent thereto, the proposal is said to be accepted: a proposal, when accepted, becomes a promise.

How to made an acceptance?
💜Section 9-So far as the acceptance of any promise is made in words, the acceptance is said to be expressed. If the acceptance is made other than in words, the acceptance is said to be implied.

💜Section 7(a) of the Contract Act 1950-Acceptance must be absolute and must conform exactly with the terms of the offer. If the offeree is required to perform an act or to pay a sum of money, the act must be done accordingly.

💜Section 7(b)of the Contract Act 1950-The offeree can communicate his acceptance in any usual manner, so long as the manner he used is the one which do not cause any delay. However, if there is a made of acceptance prescribed by the offeror in the offer, it must be followed in order to make a valid acceptance

1.Case Felthouse V Bindley

Fact: Felthouse 写信给 Bindley要买他的马,他表示如果我没有听到任何有关马的消息,我就会以$40把这匹马当成我的。 Bindley有打算把马卖给Felthouse但是没有回复他。Bindley有和拍卖者沟通不卖这匹马,但是拍卖者不小心把马卖了。 Felthouse对 Bindley 提起诉讼,因为把Felthouse的财产转移

Held:这个合同不成立,因为Bindley没有accept,因此Felthouse败诉

2.Acceptance must be made within a reasonable time (Case Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Ltd V Montefiore)

Section 6(b)-an offer is revoked by the lapse of time prescribed in the proposal for its acceptance, or if no time so prescribed, by the lapse of a reasonable time, without communication of acceptance

Fact: Montefiore 在6月8日applied Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Ltd股份,期间一直不受理。在11月23日,Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Ltd接受Montefiore applied的股份。可是,Montefiore不愿意付款,Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Ltd提出诉讼,Montefiore违约

Held:Montefiore 有权不付款,因为他们之间没有合约,因为没有在合理的时间acceptance

3.Case Ignatius V Bell

Fact:Bell 卖estate给Ignatius, Ignatius必须在8月20日前给acceptance。 8月16日的时候,Ignatius寄出acceptance的信,因为Bell不在,所以8月25号Bell才去拿信。Ignatius以specific performance提出诉讼并有权购买land

Held:Ignatius有权购买土地,因为他已经在8月20日前寄出accept的信了

4.Case Adam V Lindsell

Fact:9月2号,Lindsell 卖wool给发展商Adam。Lindsell 预测Adam会在8号前给acceptance。由于Lindsell写错地址,因此在9月5号才给Adam发过acceptance。当天下午,Lindsell给Adam发acceptance,可是Lindsell在9月9号才收到acceptance。Lindsell在9月8日的时候把货卖给第三方了。

Held:Adam的acceptance是有效的,因为他在合理的时间给acceptance

5.Acceptance subject to contract (Case Low Kar Yit & Ors V Mohamed Isa & Anor)

Fact: Mohamed Isa& Anor打算和Low Kar Yit的agent买一块地(需经过双方起草同意的正式合同,并得到法律批准) 。P的agent愿意卖但是Mohamed Isa& Anor不愿意签agreement。Low Kar Yit提出诉讼表示Mohamed Isa&Anor违约

Held:该选择权是以双方当事人商定的正式合同为条件,因此双方当事人之间没有订立合同,所以没有违约

6.Case Dunmore V Alexander

Fact: Betty Alexander受雇于Lady Agnew。她写信给Dunmore,提供Betty Alexander服务。Dunmore通过邮寄方式接受了这个提议,后来又寄了一封信撤销了接受。虽然Lady Agnew在撤销前收到了接受,但她同时将两人转交给了Betty。Betty因违反合同而提起诉讼

Held:在这种情况下,允许撤销涉因为同时到达两条消息。然而,接受可以通过到达要约的信函或在接受信之前撤销

Consideration

1. Natural Love and Affection (Case Re Tan Soh Sim V Tan Saw Keow)

Fact:Tan Soh Sim 死了,他打算把遗产留给4个养子。Tan Soh Sim的近亲满足他的遗愿(没有立遗嘱的情况下)。他的近亲写个合同把财产留给4个养子。

Held:养子是与他们的父母有关系,和Tan Soh Sim的亲戚无关,这个合同是无效的,因为consider as natural love and affection

2.Consideration need not be adequate (Case Phang Swee Kim V Beh I Hock)

Fact: Phang Swee Kim同意以RM500把地卖给 Beh I Hock (实际上这个地的市价大于rm500)Phang Swee Kim之后拒绝售卖。

Held:agreement是有效的就算consideration不平等。有consideration就可以了

3.Consideration can move from any other person (Case Venkata Chinnaya V Verikatara Maya)

Fact:姐姐同意每年支付RS653给弟弟(没有consideration的承诺),但是在同一天,妈妈给姐姐一些land让她持续付给弟弟。之后她没有支付给弟弟,他的弟弟提起诉讼。

Held:姐姐必须支付给弟弟,虽然她没有和弟弟有任何consideration,但妈妈提供了consideration

4.Consideration must have value unless it is an obligation to do so (Case Collin V Godefroy)

Fact:Godefroy 答应 Collin要付她钱如果Collin作她的证人。不久后,Collin收到了法庭的传唤做证人,Godefroy 拒绝支付。Collin提出诉讼要求payment

Held:Godefroy有权不支付,这是身为公民责任

5.Waiver of Consideration (Case Kerpa Singh V Bariam Singh )

Fact:Bariam Singh欠Kerpa Singh 多过$8000. Bariam Singh的孩子给Kerpa Signh$4000的支票settle全部债务。Kerpa Signh没有回应,但是他去兑换现金。Kerpa Signh要讨回剩下的钱,因此Kerpa Singh提出诉讼

Held:Kerpa Signh不能和Bariam Singh讨回剩下的钱,因为Kerpa Signh用行动同意了Bariam Singh孩子的意思。如果Kerpa Signh想要$8000,Kerpa Signh不应该去兑换cash,应该拒绝。

Intention to create legal reation

A.Domestic Arrangement
1.Case Balfour V Balfour

Fact: 丈夫在国外工作答应会给妻子钱。承诺的时候,夫妻关系良好。之后婚姻关系出问题,丈夫不愿意支付钱给妻子,妻子提出诉讼。

Held:不成功,因为当时关系良好,没有intend to to be legally bound

2.Case Merrit V Merrit

Fact:Mr Merrit和他的妻子有个联名的房子,Mr Merrit之后找小三,抛弃妻子和小三同居。他和妻子有个约定,每个月给妻子$40,然后妻子继续一起付房子,房子付完后,把房子转给妻子。Mr Merrit不愿意转,妻子提出诉讼

Held:agreement is binding。因为当时关系已经破裂了,intend to to be legally bound

B.Commercial Agreement
1.Case Edwards V Skyways LTD

Fact: Edward是为Skyways LTD工作的航空公司飞行员。Skyways LTD说,如果Edward撤回对公司养老基金的缴款,公司将向他支付等价物。Edward同意,并撤回了他的贡献。然后,公司遇到了财务困难,没有向他支付付款。

Held:该协议是在商业背景下达成的,这提出了一个强有力的假设,即该协议具有法律约束力。Edwards 可以claim

Capacity

💜Section 10 of CA 1950- all agreement are contract if they are made by the free consent of parties competent to contract, for lawful consideration and with a lawful object, and are not hereby expressly declared to be void
an agreement is enforceable as a valid  contract of the party to the contract are competent 

💜Section 11 of CA 1950- Every person is competent who is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject,and who is of sound mind, and is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject

1.Case Mohori bibee V Dhurmodas Ghose

Fact:被告(未成年人)将几套房子的抵押贷款交给了放债人(Brahmo Dutt)。随后,答辩人由其母亲和监护人作为下一个朋友对Brahmo Dutt提起诉讼,称答辩人在执行抵押时未成年,并要求宣布抵押无效和无效。

Held:合同无效

2. Case Tan Hee Juan V Teh Boon Keat

Fact: 一个婴儿代表D执行土地转让。随后对转让进行了登记。然后,P向法院申请撤销转让的命令。

Held– 法院宣布转让无效。

3.Contract for scholarship(Contract for necessaries) (Case Government of Malaysia V Gurcharan Singh& ORS)

💜Section 4 of the CA 1950 - not with standing anything to the contrary contained in the principal Act, no scholarship agreement shall be invalidated on the ground that the scholar entering into such agreement is not the age of majority

Fact:政府借Gurcharan Singh &ORS RM11500 for education。当时他还未成年,Gurcharan Singh& ORS 拒绝还钱。政府告他们

Held:Gurcharan Singh&ORS 必须还钱

4. Unsound mind (Case Matthews V Baxter)

💜Section 12(1) of the CA 1950 - a person is said to be of sound mind for the purpose of making a contract if, at the time when he makes it, he is capable of understanding it and if forming a rational judgement as to effect upon his interest

Fact:Baxter喝醉了,在拍卖会上同意购买房产。一旦他清醒,他决定与希望确认合同。然而,他随后想取消合同,他提出他在拍卖期间喝醉了。

Held - Baxter在清醒后确认合同,因此他取消合同并提出他喝醉了的行动不适用。

Certainty

1. Case Karuppan Chetiy V Suah Thian

Fact:租$35 for as long as he wish

Held:agreement是void的因为uncertainty (不确定性)


2022年5月3日星期二

华语bot筹款截止



早安安康,
  为了升级华语bot,我们因此才筹钱(RM50),每个人只需RM0.1-RM2.00。虽然一人一点,但是积少成多,我们已经在昨晚完成了目标🎯 

截止有63好心人士捐钱48次点击(tng 点击帮忙8次获取 rm3 )

因为我们正式关闭筹款项目咯!
注意!筹钱行动暂停❗️筹钱行动暂停❗️筹钱行动暂停❗️

感恩有您们的支持~感谢热爱华语的人士~为支持华社者致谢❤️

4/5/2022 更新


 华语bot筹款截止

2022年5月1日星期日

 

华语bot筹款截止

大家好,即日起将举行RM50的筹募活动。此活动公开致任意有兴趣推广华文的朋友们。希望各位多多益善,仅需RM0.10-RM2.00既可。




此活动的主旨是为了将收集的历年考题试卷和作文文章存入bot中。此外,我也会增加视频素材和更系统化的管理华文文学bot。不晓得大家是否有同感?视频可以让我们产生共鸣,更容易从中学习。希望各位支持,让学弟学妹们有机会通过视频素材学习。当然,我也会特制一个区域,专门感谢各位善心人士的贡献。




为了不辜负各位的用心,预计在升级后的两个星期内能完成更新 。相信大家会好奇为什么要更新bot吧? 第一是刚刚提到会更系统化管理华文文学的bot,故此会将华文文学做成另一个bot。第二是可增加bot存档文件数量和可以有更多的分类,避免文件掺杂,也可以让大家看得舒服快乐和热爱学习。




如果有意提供更大的捐款资金,可以私下联系本人。各位可以通过touch and go(可通过图里的二维码转账)/银行转账/扫码。✨注释✨要注明自己的名字和电话号码哦以方便我们记录~

愿各位尽绵薄之力,支持知识,支持科技。祝各位心有所想,劳有所获,不负生活。

欲知更多详情,可在此平台询问。











精简版
大家好,为了给各位带来更好的用户体验,及使用SPM华文Bot的便利,XXX决定升级此Bot。然而,我们面临经费不足的问题,在此呼吁大家踊跃捐助,以下附上筹募事宜的详情:

预计筹募金额:RM50

筹募期限:1/5/22-筹募数额达标

筹募对象:大众

捐款限制:RM0.10-RM 2

*注释*

可以通过Touch & Go 方式 与银行转账 (有意者可以要求扫码)

  • 有意捐款更大数额者,请私下联系,联络方式为

  • 📞011-61308113(liang)

  • 📞telegram: @leeliang126

  • 📞wechat    : leeliang0326

  • 📞email      :leeliang0326@gmail.com

预计更新时间:升级Bot后的两个星期内

更新事项:

  • 按钮可以使用同名

  • 增加button数量&bot存的文件数量

  • 把华语文学做成另个bot(以便更好归纳、搜索)

  • 增加一名管理员(Admin)

  • 搜寻功能

  • 尽量实现全部事项

  • 如果升级更多事项需要更多金额!

升级后要做什么?有什么规划?

  • 把历年的预考试卷放入bot里

  • 增加视频素材

  • 作文文章

  • 会开一个区域放入贡献者的名字,特此感谢每一位贡献者


✨华语bot链接

https://t.me/SPM_Bahan_BahasaCina_BOT


华语bot介绍

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRTsbUiF8i4&feature=youtu.be





个人账号--


🌟微信号: leeliang0326 

🌟telegram:  @leeliang126 

🌟fb page:https://m.facebook.com/studyfriendsclub/ 

🌟ig:https://www.instagram.com/ah_liang6699/ 

🌟email:leeliang0326@gmail.com 

🌟blogger:https://leelianglearning.blogspot.com 

🌟YouTube:https://youtube.com/channel/UCY-KmxmRk6WZKOeAMFBTxPQ 

🌟小红书:https://www.xiaohongshu.com/user/profile/5de3056c00000000010088a5?xhsshare=CopyLink&appuid=5de3056c00000000010088a5&apptime=1647245114 

🌟抖音:https://v.douyin.com/NhL7aK6/


华语bot筹款截止

LIANG分享处

       分享 处 今天我来分享我的 diploma civil engineering(DKA) 学习经验与一些经历 我在这个学期里有拿的科目有 8 科 +1 co-curriculum (共 19   credit hours/19 积分)如图: 注明: 第一与第二科目...